Law enforcement often finds itself in the crosshairs of public opinion when it comes to transparency. Yet balancing privacy with transparency requires diligence, staff time, agency resources, and strong policy and procedure. Navigating the path between public demands for transparency to ensure accountability and privacy for citizens and law enforcement remains crucial for trust and safety. Balancing these separate and sometimes competing interests is incredibly challenging when that technology collects large amounts of data.
Using Technology for Transparency
One of the most effective ways to foster transparency in law enforcement is through the strategic use of technology. Body-worn cameras (BWCs) and dashcams have become pivotal in documenting police interactions, providing a clear record of events from an officer’s point of view. Technologies like BWCs and dashcam footage increase transparency but complicate the balance between openness and privacy. Before an agency can release footage for public viewing, it needs to be screened and redacted by blurring images of juveniles and removing personal data from video and audio.
Beyond video, data-sharing platforms have allowed law enforcement agencies to communicate more openly with the communities they serve. Crime mapping tools, for instance, provide real-time data on local criminal activities, helping residents stay informed and feel more secure. Social media platforms are also methods of sharing information quickly with the public, from suspect descriptions to road closures. With each release of information to the public, the challenge becomes ensuring the information shared does not violate privacy rights or jeopardize investigations.
When Public Information is Not Public
While the public often has a right to access government records, certain types of information remain protected. One such category is personal identifying information (PII), such as Social Security numbers and health records, which could place individuals at risk if disclosed. Law enforcement must also balance the need for transparency through public information with victims' rights.
Many organizations and community groups push for more transparency by law enforcement, and some citizens take it upon themselves to film police interactions – even those they are not involved in – strictly to post them for public view. Balancing the public desire for information is always weighed against the needs of the victims and the nature of an investigation. Some information must remain law enforcement only to ensure officer safety or ongoing investigations are not compromised.
Public Expectations for Privacy vs. Legal Reality
Public expectations around privacy are often at odds with legal realities. While people generally expect their interactions with law enforcement to remain private, the law does not always guarantee this. In many jurisdictions, interactions between police and the public, including arrests and charges, are considered public records and subject to disclosure. Conversely, privacy laws and the need to protect ongoing investigations protect some information. Striking a balance between these conflicting expectations requires clear communication with the public, which doesn’t always end the echo chamber of public sentiment – especially after a serious incident involving law enforcement.
When it comes to ongoing investigations, law enforcement faces even tighter restrictions on transparency. Active investigations, particularly those involving serious crimes, require a delicate balance between keeping the public informed and protecting the integrity of the case. Establishing a culture of transparency through public education can help build trust even when the entire disclosure of information is not legally or ethically feasible.
Sharing Details Without Violating Privacy
Law enforcement professionals often face significant trauma as part of their work, and sharing these experiences can be crucial for mental health and recovery. Recounting these incidents without violating privacy can be challenging. It’s human nature to want to share some aspects of an incident with friends, family, or even others in the agency who may not have clearance for that information. Still, first responders have to be wary of sharing sensitive, private information.
Discussing the emotional impact of such events is vital for well-being, but privacy laws must be observed. Some agencies have addressed this challenge by creating confidential support programs, such as peer support groups and employee assistance programs, where officers can share their experiences in a controlled, private environment. These platforms allow emotional decompression without crossing legal boundaries or disclosing sensitive information.
Public Education
Balancing privacy with transparency is a continual challenge for law enforcement. Agencies face public demands for transparency, and technology makes data release more challenging due to the sheer volume of information that must be reviewed and redacted prior to public release. The increase in data storage needs and frequently changing laws regarding privacy puts pressure on law enforcement staff to know what to release and what not to.
Through the careful use of technology, understanding the legal limits of public information, and maintaining transparency while protecting sensitive details, law enforcement can work towards building trust with the communities it serves. Privacy—whether that of civilians, officers, or the integrity of investigations—remains an essential factor that cannot be ignored. Educating the public on the information that can be shared improves transparency and establishes trust while building a stronger relationship within the community.
